Strategy, tokenomics, and audits
for Web3 and Web2 projects

It depends on where you are in the process and what the real task is. If you already have a model but there are questions around it, an audit is usually the right place to start. If the tokenomics need to be built from scratch, that is a tokenomics engagement. If the scope is broader and includes strategy, TGE preparation, investor readiness, and go-to-market planning, then strategic consulting makes more sense. If you are unsure, that is exactly what the consultation is for.

Absolutely. We often step into projects that already have tokenomics, a white paper, spreadsheets with calculations, or other working materials. In those cases, we don't start from scratch for no reason. We look at what can be kept, what needs refining, and what makes more sense to rebuild.

No. We work not only with Web3 projects, but also with Web2 teams that already have a live business or product and want to enter Web3 through token economics.

Yes, that is a very common path. An audit often shows whether the model only needs a few targeted fixes or whether the project is already at the point where it needs a deeper tokenomics rebuild or broader strategic work.

We usually start with a short call to understand your project, the task in front of you, and the broader context. Even at that stage, it is usually clear which format makes sense, how deep the work needs to go, and what the next step should be.

Anything you already have: presentations, a white paper, a tokenomics deck, Excel files, a roadmap, a product overview, current calculations, or simply a clear description of the task. Even if the materials are still limited, that is usually enough to have a focused conversation.

Yes. The earlier we get involved, the lower the risk of making costly mistakes at the start. Quite often, teams come to us not with a full set of materials, but with a short, still unstructured idea and no detailed write-up yet. In those cases, we help clarify what is missing, where the weak spots are, and what the right starting point should be.

Yes. If what you need first is an outside perspective and an honest read on the situation, a consultation is a good place to start. Sometimes it makes the next step obvious. Sometimes it shows that the project is not ready for a larger engagement yet.

Later as well. We work with projects at very different stages: when the token is still just being discussed, when the model is already in place, when the team is preparing for a token sale, or when it becomes clear that the current economics need to be revisited.

We can, but that question almost always calls for a deeper review. For us, it is not just about giving a general verdict. It is about understanding what actually makes the model strong, where the risks are built in, and how confidently you can rely on it going forward.

We don't look at the token as a standalone model component. We look at it as part of the business economy. That is why we care about more than tables, charts, and allocations. What matters to us is how the token fits into the product, demand, user experience, investment logic, and the project's growth.